Linux Weekly News

The place to discuss Linux and Unix Operating Systems
Forum rules
Behave
Post Reply
User avatar
Zema Bus
Your Co-Host
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:25 am
Location: Arizona

Linux Weekly News

Post by Zema Bus »

These are done by Wendell of Level1Techs. This one is 19 mins.

User avatar
Grogan
Your Host
Posts: 3232
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2021 10:04 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Linux Weekly News

Post by Grogan »

Even the "Tech Gurus" hate Windows now :lol:

Bazzite, schmazzite... it would be hard to help somebody with that. If it doesn't involve turning it off and on again, there probably isn't much you can do with that.
User avatar
Zema Bus
Your Co-Host
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:25 am
Location: Arizona

Re: Linux Weekly News

Post by Zema Bus »

I tried out Bazzite a couple years ago, wasn't my cup of tea :)
User avatar
Zema Bus
Your Co-Host
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:25 am
Location: Arizona

Re: Linux Weekly News

Post by Zema Bus »

In this one he talked about the Cpanel vulnerability and the Linux Copy Fail vulnerability.

User avatar
Grogan
Your Host
Posts: 3232
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2021 10:04 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Linux Weekly News

Post by Grogan »

He needn't be that righteously admonishing... I doubt he's ever worked on complex software like operating system kernels and server admin front ends etc. (if ever anything, at all). What's happening right now is that AI is finding flaws, in ways that humans haven't thought of yet.
User avatar
Zema Bus
Your Co-Host
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:25 am
Location: Arizona

Re: Linux Weekly News

Post by Zema Bus »

User avatar
Grogan
Your Host
Posts: 3232
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2021 10:04 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Linux Weekly News

Post by Grogan »

I heard about that, yeah. I don't like Debian, so I don't care, but that's just going to make things more onerous for packagers and developers. I would say, fine... don't include my software because I'm not doing that. (It's not only the compiler, the code and build setup has to be conducive)

It's pointless. If you want packages that are bit for bit identical, use signed binaries. Why would you even want to build it? I certainly want my packages different than the distributor... I want them optimized and usually customized in some way (e.g. fewer dependencies or edited/patched in some cases)

Everything I compile is a different binary every time. Everything I tar has a different checksum every time too. It's just the way it is. It's the source code I'm starting with that has to be identical.
Post Reply