These are done by Wendell of Level1Techs. This one is 19 mins.
Linux Weekly News
Forum rules
Behave
Behave
- Zema Bus
- Your Co-Host
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:25 am
- Location: Arizona
- Grogan
- Your Host
- Posts: 3232
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2021 10:04 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Linux Weekly News
Even the "Tech Gurus" hate Windows now 
Bazzite, schmazzite... it would be hard to help somebody with that. If it doesn't involve turning it off and on again, there probably isn't much you can do with that.
Bazzite, schmazzite... it would be hard to help somebody with that. If it doesn't involve turning it off and on again, there probably isn't much you can do with that.
- Zema Bus
- Your Co-Host
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:25 am
- Location: Arizona
Re: Linux Weekly News
I tried out Bazzite a couple years ago, wasn't my cup of tea 
- Zema Bus
- Your Co-Host
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:25 am
- Location: Arizona
- Grogan
- Your Host
- Posts: 3232
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2021 10:04 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Linux Weekly News
He needn't be that righteously admonishing... I doubt he's ever worked on complex software like operating system kernels and server admin front ends etc. (if ever anything, at all). What's happening right now is that AI is finding flaws, in ways that humans haven't thought of yet.
- Zema Bus
- Your Co-Host
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:25 am
- Location: Arizona
- Grogan
- Your Host
- Posts: 3232
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2021 10:04 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Linux Weekly News
I heard about that, yeah. I don't like Debian, so I don't care, but that's just going to make things more onerous for packagers and developers. I would say, fine... don't include my software because I'm not doing that. (It's not only the compiler, the code and build setup has to be conducive)
It's pointless. If you want packages that are bit for bit identical, use signed binaries. Why would you even want to build it? I certainly want my packages different than the distributor... I want them optimized and usually customized in some way (e.g. fewer dependencies or edited/patched in some cases)
Everything I compile is a different binary every time. Everything I tar has a different checksum every time too. It's just the way it is. It's the source code I'm starting with that has to be identical.
It's pointless. If you want packages that are bit for bit identical, use signed binaries. Why would you even want to build it? I certainly want my packages different than the distributor... I want them optimized and usually customized in some way (e.g. fewer dependencies or edited/patched in some cases)
Everything I compile is a different binary every time. Everything I tar has a different checksum every time too. It's just the way it is. It's the source code I'm starting with that has to be identical.